For the fourth time this 12 months, the Maryland Larger Schooling Fee met to resolve whether or not to permit a state college to maneuver ahead with a brand new diploma program over the objection of one other establishment.
However Wednesday marked the second time the fee reviewed a proposal from Stevenson College to create a bodily remedy doctoral program.
Fee Chair Catherine “Cassie” Motz mentioned the board was primarily “redoing” an April 26 assembly.
Maryland HBCU Advocates wrote a letter to Motz on Tuesday arguing that shouldn’t occur, particularly since a legislative work group was shaped to offer suggestions on modifications to the diploma approval course of on the state’s faculties and universities.
“As advocates, we…advocate a moratorium on granting packages till the workgroup of the Maryland Common Meeting places forth its suggestions in December of 2023,” mentioned Sharon Blake, a spokesperson for the group comprised of supporters and alumni of traditionally Black establishments and universities.
Motz mentioned a assessment assembly can’t be postponed with out the consent of the establishment proposing a brand new tutorial program.
The present situation started in February when Emily Dow, assistant secretary of educational affairs for the fee, really useful approval of the Stevenson program primarily based on a number of elements akin to a “substantial and rising workforce want in Maryland for Bodily Therapists.”
Officers with the College of Maryland Jap Shore (UMES) and College of Maryland Baltimore (UMB) requested a assessment assembly with the fee to problem Dow’s choice. They declare the Stevenson program can be “unreasonably duplicative” and trigger “demonstrable hurt” to the packages at their colleges.
Commissioners agreed and voted April 26 to overturn Dow’s choice.
In accordance with the assembly minutes, seven commissioners voted to adjourn right into a closed-door session and make the choice that wasn’t unanimous. Though the minutes present who was in attendance, it doesn’t state the precise vote.
Nonetheless, former Fee Chair Mary Pat Seurkamp wrote in a Might 10 letter to Stevenson President Elliot Hirshman that the college might resubmit a brand new plan that “wouldn’t affect time to completion for college kids in current packages nor affect school recruitment at different establishments.”
Motz additionally inferred {that a} new vote could also be wanted in gentle of an August recommendation letter from the Workplace of the Legal professional Common.
Patrick B. Hughes, chief counsel for opinions and recommendation within the legal professional basic’s workplace, concluded a controversial 4-3 choice in June to permit Towson College to create a enterprise analytics doctoral program wasn’t legitimate as a result of solely 4 members voted in favor of the plan. Hughes wrote a minimum of seven of the fee’s 12 members must vote in favor or towards proposals.
The chief counsel steered the fee ought to meet once more to resolve Towson’s attraction and file a majority vote.
Barely greater than every week after Hughes’ letter, Towson introduced it’ll withdraw its plan due to an earlier request from the fee for establishments to “pause” new diploma proposals if an objection is raised by one other college. Nonetheless, the fee didn’t ask colleges to stop submitting new program proposals.
‘Want of reform’
Johns Hopkins College has additionally submitted paperwork to create a bodily remedy doctoral program and was “really useful for implementation,” in keeping with a July 14 letter from Appearing Secretary of Larger Schooling Sanjay Rai.
Rai wrote that though this system can be much like these the College of Maryland Jap Shore and College of Maryland Baltimore, the market demand for these packages are excessive within the state.
“I strongly encourage JHU, UMB, and UMES to collaborate to advance schooling and analysis in healthcare fields to assist the residents of Maryland and to proceed to make healthcare extra accessible and inexpensive, each domestically and globally,” Rai wrote.
The letter was despatched lower than every week earlier than Rai and Motz issued a joint letter asking establishments to pause submissions of latest tutorial packages when a protest is lodged.
However UMES and UMB requested a Sept. 7 assessment assembly be rescheduled, particularly since commissioner management requested for a “pause” in new packages. The assembly nonetheless happened and the fee will situation a written opinion inside 10 enterprise days of that assembly.
On Wednesday, Commissioner Ray Serrano requested the Stevenson president why the college didn’t adhere to the “pause” issued by Rai and Motz.
“It wasn’t codified in any manner. The implications of requesting or taking a pause [were] not totally clear,” mentioned Hirshman, who added the college submitted paperwork for its plan in December 2022. “Our fee listening to was speculated to be in April… So given this timeline and all of the exercise over the past a number of weeks, we imagine it’s applicable to proceed with our fee listening to.”
Earlier than the board went right into a closed-door session to deliberate onStevenson’s plan, Motz mentioned a written choice will probably be issued inside 10 enterprise days.
Motz, who convened her second assessment assembly Wednesday, mentioned the voting process will change; future choice letters from the fee will state a vote whole, the rationale of a choice and who supported and opposed an instructional proposal.
Since 2018, letters despatched to highschool officers after assessment conferences don’t state a vote tally.
Motz and 6 different commissioners have been appointed by Gov. Wes Moore (D) in July.
“It appears to me that there’s an unusually lengthy and complex procedural historical past right here,” Motz mentioned. “Commissioners acknowledge and agree with the consensus throughout the state that the present, long-standing tutorial assessment course of is in nice want of reform. We’re grateful to the legislature for forming a piece group to overtake and enhance the method.”
Republish
